March 28, 1948. Sunday night on NBC radio. Jack Benny is walking home from a party with Ronald Colman’s Oscar under his arm, a borrowed statuette he has promised to guard, when a mugger steps out of the dark and delivers the 6 words every listener knows from pulp novels:
“Your money or your life.”
Silence.
The mugger tries again, louder.
“Look, bud! I said, your money or your life!”
And Benny, radio’s most famous miser, snaps back:
“I’m thinking it over!”
The laugh ran for decades as radio legend, because the choice is supposed to be easy. Two economists tested how easy, and found people answering the mugger the way Benny did.
1 point out of 100
Researchers asked Americans a version of the mugger’s question in an experiment titled “Is Money Overrated?” First, respondents predicted how much a 20% raise would lift their life satisfaction on a 0-to-100 scale. Then a randomly chosen group saw the scientific evidence, finding that a 20% income increase moves life satisfaction by only about 1 point out of 100.
People had overestimated the effect for others, and overestimated it even more for themselves. Shown the evidence, they revised their beliefs downward. The new beliefs changed behaviour, too. In job-choice scenarios and in a real decision each one was facing, informed respondents put less weight on income. They grew less willing to take the better-paid job when it arrived with the usual freight of longer hours, a worse commute, more meetings and decisions that follow you home.
The bias they measured was the focusing illusion. When you compare two job offers, the salaries sit in the foreground, printed in bold, easy to subtract from each other. The 05:45 alarm does not appear in the offer letter. Neither does the evening you will spend rehearsing an argument with your boss in the shower. Whatever you attend to swells, and whatever stays off the page shrinks toward zero. A salary negotiation is a machine for thinking about salary.
Kahneman compressed the whole “Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer?” paper into one sentence:
“Nothing in life is as important as you think it is, while you are thinking about it.”
When we ask ourselves if we would be happier if we made more money, we instantly isolate our focus on the things money can buy. In doing so, we completely ignore all the other factors that actually dictate our daily mood.
The man who knew
Joe Dominguez grew up poor in Spanish Harlem and spent 10 years on Wall Street as a technical stock analyst, building charting tools and writing a weekly market letter. In 1969, at 31, he quit. He had saved about $70,000, put it in Treasury bonds, and lived on roughly $6,000 a year for the rest of his life. He never took paid work again.
What he did instead was teach, free of charge, a 9-step course about how money is life energy, the hours of your one life converted into paper. By his arithmetic you never earn your stated wage. Add the commute to the hours worked, add the work wardrobe, the decompression drink, the vacations taken to recover from the job, then divide again. The real hourly wage always comes out lower, sometimes by half, and every purchase can then be priced in hours of remaining life. Joe’s favorite question was:
“Are you making a living or making a dying?”
Vicki Robin, his partner and co-teacher, turned the course into a book in 1992. They named it Your Money or Your Life, after the stickup line. Robin’s appearance on Oprah pushed it onto the New York Times bestseller list, past a million copies, and the book became the founding text of the FIRE movement.
Henry David Thoreau had already done Dominguez’s arithmetic in Walden (1854):
“The cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life which is required to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long run.”
40% more of your life
Researchers followed German workers from 1985 to 2003 and concluded with “Stress That Doesn’t Pay: The Commuting Paradox”. Standard economics says nobody accepts a long commute unless the pay or the housing compensates for it, but the data showed no such compensation anywhere. People commuting an hour each way reported lower life satisfaction, worse health satisfaction and lower satisfaction with the job itself.
The one-hour commuter would need roughly 40% more salary to feel as satisfied as a colleague who walks to work. Raises attached to job switches tend to run between 10 and 20%. The market never pays the commuting bill, and workers keep signing, because the offer letter shows the raise and hides the road.
Sleep sits on the other side of the same ledger. In 2017 researchers surveyed more than 8,000 Britons for the Living Well Index and weighted 60 life factors with wellbeing. The widest gap between the people living best and worst was neither income nor home ownership, but feeling rested after sleep. Moving from feeling rested some of the time to feeling rested like the top group was worth about 4 points on the index’s 0-to-100 scale. Hold that against the raise experiment. 20% more income buys 1 point. A good sleep and an uhurried morning outbid the promotion 4 to 1.
People who choose time are happier. Asked whether they wanted more money or more time most chose money, yet the minority who chose time was happier. Spending money to buy time, on cleaning help or delivered groceries, lifts life satisfaction more than spending the same money on objects. The evidence keeps pointing the same direction the mugger’s gun does.
The scoreboard of life
The old joke goes:
“Bob Smith died yesterday at the age of 74. He finished life in 186th place.”
The laugh comes because there is no leaderboard, but everyone is living as if there were one.
A salary is one number, but rested mornings and short commutes resist ranking. Nobody stands at a barbecue announcing they climbed 3 places in sleeping well, whereas a new title and a new pay band slot into the standings instantly.
So the countable ends up standing in for the whole life, the way the kilometre count stands in for a road trip, adding up the distance and missing the sunset that made you pull over and the conversation that ended with you falling in love.
The scoreboard is the focusing illusion with numbers on it. Bob Smith’s obituary is the reductio of 48 years of marriage, fishing trips and grandchildren compress into a number.
Paid in hours, paid out in logarithms
Money does buy happiness. Kahneman and Deaton (2010) had found day-to-day wellbeing flattening around $75,000. Killingsworth’s 2021 experience found no plateau at all. Reanalysed together in 2023, both turned out to be right, but about different people. For most, happiness keeps rising with income far past $100,000, and among the happiest it accelerates. Only an unhappy minority hits a ceiling, near $100,000, past which more money does nothing for them.
But before you ask for a raise look at the units. Happiness rises with the logarithm of income, so each equal step in feeling happier costs a doubling in pay. The move from $50,000 to $100,000 and the move from $100,000 to $200,000 buy the same lift in happiness, but the second doubling is purchased with the same currency as the first: hours, which do not compound and are capped at 24 a day.
You work hours linearly but get paid logarithmically. Every raise costs about the same in life and delivers less than the one before it. A staircase where each step keeps its height while the floors grow twice as far apart.
What puts someone in the unhappy minority is the ordinary machinery of a squeezed life: chronic stress, exhaustion, thinning friendships and bad sleep. Those are the long commute, the short nights, the Sunday-evening dread and the decisions that follow you home, the freight the higher-paying job ships with.
Take enough of those trades and you can ride the raises straight into the one group money has stopped helping, still holding a scorecard that says you are winning.
Still thinking it over?
Go back to the studio on March 28, 1948 and the man who cannot choose between his money and his life. Nobody in the seats was laughing down at Benny. They had jobs waiting on Monday and commutes to get home through, and every one of them had already answered the mugger that morning without noticing the question.
Dominguez took it seriously enough to answer. He walked out at 31, lived 28 years on $6,000 a year, and when cancer came in January 1997 he mailed cards 2 days before the end to all his friends and family, saying he had been given “a clean bill of death,” and would everyone please direct their attention to the living.
The mugger needs no gun. He stands behind every job offer and every 05:45 alarm, and he accepts instalments. “I’m thinking it over” is an honest answer, for a while. Benny got the longest laugh out of the pause. You can get one life out of yours.
Leave feedback about this