Man only likes to count his troubles

Fyodor Dostoyevsky, a name that reverberates through the corridors of literature, was more than a mere writer. Imagine Dostoyevsky—a man with ink-stained fingers, not from idle scribbling, but from etching profound truths. His journey began amidst fairy tales and legends, where words danced like fireflies. But life wasn’t all enchantment. His mother’s death when he was fifteen cast shadows, and soon, he left school to enter the Nikolayev Military Engineering Institute.

In the mid-1840s, he penned his first novel, “Poor Folk”, gaining entry into Saint Petersburg’s literary circles. But fate had other plans. Dostoyevsky was arrested in 1849 for belonging to a banned literary group. His sentence—death by firing squad—was commuted at the last moment. He spent four years in a Siberian prison camp, followed by six years of compulsory military service in exile.

Dostoyevsky isn’t a mere accountant; he’s a philosopher. Imagine humanity hunched over an abacus, tallying woes—the unpaid bills, the heartaches, the sleepless nights. We’re experts at counting troubles.

But what about happiness? It’s not a currency we hoard. It’s the quiet moments—the warmth of a cup of tea, the laughter shared, the scent of rain-soaked earth. We don’t calculate these joys; we overlook them.

Here lies the revelation. Troubles are loud; they scream for attention. Happiness is subtle; it tiptoes in when we least expect it. Dostoyevsky nudges us to recalibrate our ledger—to weigh joys as well as sorrows.

Dostoyevsky’s wisdom isn’t about blind optimism. It’s about seeing the whole equation. Troubles matter, but so does happiness. Perhaps, if we counted both, we’d find that life’s balance sheet isn’t as dire as we think.

Resources