1. Your body writes the story

In 2011, a team of researchers at Ben-Gurion University studied over a thousand parole hearings in Israeli courts. They found something that should alarm anyone who believes in impartial justice. Prisoners who appeared before the judge right before lunch were denied parole roughly 100% of the time. Prisoners who appeared right after lunch were paroled at close to 65% of the time.

“The judges weren’t corrupt. They were hungry.”

Barrett uses this study to introduce two ideas that form the bedrock of her entire theory:

  1. Interoception and affect
    Interoception is your brain’s continuous monitoring of your body’s internal state. Your heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, glucose, hormones, inflammation, and the stretching of your lungs and stomach. This monitoring produces a constant hum of feeling called affect. Affect is not an emotion, but a summary of how your body budget is doing, the way a bank balance summarises thousands of transactions (pleasant, unpleasant, calm or agitated). Every waking second, your brain is running this summary, and it colours everything you experience.
  2. Affective realism
    The second idea is what happens when this summary leaks into perception. Barrett calls it affective realism. You experience your affect-coloured perceptions as if they were objective properties of the world. You believe that the food tastes bad, when it’s really your affect that is unpleasant and your brain painting the bad taste. Your believe that your colleague is hostile, when it’s really you being sleep-deprived and your brain painting the hostility. The prisoner deserves to stay in jail, when the judge is hungry.

The mechanism behind both is Barrett’s concept of the body budget. Your brain is a predictive organ. Its most important job is managing your body’s metabolic resources (energy), by predicting how much glucose, oxygen, salt and water you’ll need and allocating them in advance. Your body-budgeting regions are what Barrett calls your inner, loudmouthed, mostly deaf scientist. Loudmouthed because they broadcast predictions to every sensory system in your brain, infusing every perception with affect. Mostly deaf because they don’t respond quickly to correction from the body. Once the predictions are off-base, it takes effort to recalibrate.

This means that no perception, no decision, and no thought is ever affect-free. When you think a food is delicious, the deliciousness is your affect, not a property of the food. When a soldier in a warzone perceives a gun in someone’s hands, he may genuinely see a gun that isn’t there. His body-budgeting regions, predicting threat, have altered the firing of neurons in his visual cortex. Barrett writes:

“Human beings are not at the mercy of mythical emotion circuits buried deep within animalistic parts of our highly evolved brain: we are architects of our own experience.”

The implications extend far beyond courtrooms. Research shows that social rejection activates the same body-budgeting regions as physical pain. Your brain treats a cutting remark and a cut finger as the same kind of budget problem. Studies on the placebo effect demonstrate that beliefs about a pill can change predictions enough to relieve real pain. And research shows that people with unbalanced body budgets perceive neutral faces as more threatening, rate ambiguous scenarios as more negative, and make worse decisions about other people’s intentions.

Affect is not about the world. Affect is about your body budget. But because of affective realism, you experience it as if it is the world. The hungry judge doesn’t think: “My blood sugar is low and I feel unpleasant.” He thinks: “This prisoner is a risk to society.” The affect is real. The perception it produces is a construction.

Why this matters

Your body budget is the foundation of your entire emotional life. When the budget is balanced and you got adequate sleep, nutrition, hydration, movement and social contact, your predictions are calibrated and your affect is a relatively accurate summary of your situation and the world. When the budget is depleted, your brain predicts threat and unpleasantness from neutral input, and affective realism makes those constructions feel like reality. This means mastering your emotions starts not with your mind but with your body. It means every perception you have of other people is filtered through your own metabolic state.

Your first question should not be “Is this person behaving bad?”, but “Am I hungry?” or “Did I get enough sleep last night?”

The toolkit included in this lessoon gives you ways to notice interoception, track affect, recognise affective realism, and start managing your body budget. This is the first steps toward becoming an architect of your experience.

Key terms

  • Interoception
    The brain’s continuous monitoring of your body’s internal state. Produces affect (pleasant/unpleasant, calm/agitated), which is the raw material of all emotion. Barrett argues it is the brain’s most fundamental sensory system.
  • Affect
    The simplest feelings (pleasant or unpleasant, calm or agitated). Not emotions, but the raw material from which emotions are constructed. A summary of the body budget’s current state.
  • Body budget (Allostasis)
    The brain’s continuous prediction and management of metabolic resources. Barrett’s informal term for what physiologists call allostasis. When balanced, you feel okay. When chronically depleted, you feel crappy, and your brain constructs that crappiness as emotion.
  • Affective realism
    The phenomenon by which your affect literally alters what you see, hear and perceive. You experience affect-coloured constructions as objective reality. Not bias layered on perception, but a change in perception itself.

Interesting facts & insights

  • Your body budget runs 24/7 even during sleep
    The interoceptive network never shuts off. During sleep, it recalibrates its predictions. Chronic sleep deprivation degrades this recalibration, which is why sleep-deprived people have noisier, more negatively biased predictions and worse emotional experiences the following day.
  • Placebos work by changing interoceptive predictions
    When you believe a pill will relieve pain, your brain adjusts its interoceptive predictions downward, triggering the release of endogenous opioids. The pain relief is real — caused by changed predictions, not by the inert pill.
  • 90% of visual cortex input is prediction
    Barrett notes that most connections into primary visual cortex carry predictions from other brain areas. Only a fraction carry actual input from the eyes. Your brain’s architecture is optimised for construction, not reception.

Resources